Wednesday, June 29, 2016

No way out: the hospital that became a childhood hell


  • The Age
  • By BILL BIRNBAUER Sunday 14 October 2001 
  • Leslie Kiriona, who was given shock treatment as a patient there in 
  • 1973. Picture: JOHN DONEGAN 
  • The New Zealand Government has apologised to 95 people who were 
  • repeatedly treated with electric shock "aversion therapy" in the 
  • 1970s while under the care of a psychiatrist now practising in 
  • Melbourne. 
  • The formal apology, by New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and 
  • Health Minister Annette King, comes with a $5.3 million pay-out to 
  • settle a class action launched by the group, all former "patients" 
  • of Lake Alice Hospital, near Palmerston North, north of Wellington. 
  • While at the hospital in the 1970s, the "patients", aged between 
  • eight and 16, were given electric shocks and painful injections for 
  • minor breaches of discipline, and lived in a state of "extreme fear 
  • and hopelessness", according to former New Zealand High Court judge 
  • Sir Rodney Gallen. 
  • He said: "Statement after statement indicates that the children 
  • concerned lived in a state of terror during the period they spent at 
  • Lake Alice. All were in need of understanding, love and 
  • compassionate care. That is not what they received at Lake Alice." 
  • Most were taken to Lake Alice Hospital because their parents or 
  • state carers could not cope with their unruly behavior. 
  • Once at the hospital, a sprawling mental institution with 
  • dormitories, a school and a maximum-security facility for the 
  • criminally insane, they came under the care of Dr Selwyn Leeks, a 
  • tall, quietly spoken man who once described electro-convulsive 
  • therapy (ECT) as "fairly definitive treatment". 
  • Dr Leeks has a practice in the bayside suburb of Cheltenham. He 
  • established the 46-bed child and adolescent unit at Lake Alice 
  • Hospital in 1972, but left in the late 1970s after two inquiries 
  • into his use of ECT. 
  • A Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria spokeswoman said the board 
  • was concerned, and would investigate to see if further action was 
  • required. 
  • Electro-convulsive therapy, during which an electric shock is 
  • administered to the brain, normally is used with anaesthetics and 
  • muscle relaxants on patients suffering severe depression or 
  • psychiatric conditions. But at Lake Alice it was used without 
  • anaesthetics or relaxants and was given to the head and other parts 
  • of the body. 
  • Sir Rodney said that ECT was "in constant use" at Lake Alice 
  • hospital - administered on children as a punishment for unacceptable 
  • behavior, low school grades or running away. 
  • "The ECT was plainly delivered as a means of inflicting pain in 
  • order to coerce behavior," he says. "ECT delivered in circumstances 
  • such as those I have described could not possibly be referred to as 
  • therapy, and when administered to defenceless children can only be 
  • described as outrageous in the extreme." 
  • Statements by the former patients, which Sir Rodney accepted as 
  • true, showed they had received ECT on their heads, legs and even 
  • their genitals in cases where they had been accused of unacceptable 
  • sexual behavior. The statements referred to two incidents in which 
  • children had administered ECT to other children under the 
  • supervision of staff. 
  • Dr Leeks came to Melbourne in 1978 and was the director of child 
  • psychiatry at a child guidance clinic. In 1986, he worked briefly as 
  • a part-time psychiatrist at the Children's Court outpatients' 
  • clinic. 
  • Dr Leeks refused to comment on the New Zealand apology and pay-out. 
  • He still faces separate court action by two former Lake Alice 
  • residents. 
  • Last week, the 20/20 television news program in New Zealand showed 
  • Dr Leeks telling a former Lake Alice resident with a hidden camera 
  • that the electric shocks were "a form of aversion therapy". When the 
  • children administered shocks to another child it was "a behavioral 
  • therapy thing". 
  • One of the victims involved in the class action, Melbourne resident 
  • Kevin Banks, told The Sunday Age he was relieved the case was over, 
  • and welcomed the apology. However, he said he still had migraines 
  • and nightmares, and relived his experiences daily. He could not work 
  • and still suffered throbbing pain on his temples, arms and legs 
  • where the electrodes were clasped more than 20 years ago. 
  • He estimated he received more than 100 ECT treatments, as well as 
  • pain-inducing injections of the sedative paraldehyde. 
  • Sir Rodney described paraldehyde as a particularly unpleasant and 
  • extremely painful injection that was used to punish children. 
  • "There can be no doubt that paraldehyde was used by staff members on 
  • their own initiative, without any instruction from medical 
  • personnel, whenever the staff member concerned wished to impose a 
  • punishment and, on the basis of some of the statements, it seems to 
  • have been administered on quite a capricious basis." 
  • Other punishments were being kept naked in solitary confinement, and 
  • threats of being placed with criminally insane adults. Several 
  • former patients complained about sexual abuse from other inmates. 
  • Sir Rodney said that perhaps the most appalling story involved a 15-
  • year-old boy who claimed he was locked in a wooden cage with a 
  • seriously deranged adult. 
  • "He describes a situation where, for a considerable period, he 
  • crouched in the corner being pawed by the particular inmate, 
  • screaming to be released and unable to get out or to get away from 
  • the contact to which he had been exposed." 
  • Sir Rodney said that even those not subjected to behavior 
  • modification lived in terror because of the random nature in which 
  • ECT was given. 
  • He had read all 95 statements and had interviewed 41 of the 
  • claimants in order to determine the amount paid to each claimant. 
  • "Claimant after claimant indicated that on one day in the week 
  • children were gathered together in the day room where they sat 
  • waiting for those to be selected to whom ECT would be applied. Both 
  • boys and girls spoke of young children lying in a foetal position on 
  • the floor in attempts to avoid being taken up for ECT, and of 
  • children who, in tears and through sheer fear, had lost control of 
  • their bodily functions before any application had taken place. 
  • Whether they received ECT or not, they all lived in fear of 
  • receiving it. 
  • "There were allegations, which I accept, that it (the ECT machine) 
  • was brought into the dining room and placed in a prominent position 
  • in order to encourage children to eat their meals if they were 
  • reluctant to do so." 
  • Complaints were made to police, welfare officers and probation 
  • officers, but they were not believed. "There was literally no way 
  • out for them," Sir Rodney said. 
  • An investigation by The Age in 1999 found that, in December 1975, Dr 
  • Leeks wrote to New Zealand welfare authorities about his use of 
  • shock treatment on a 13-year-old boy from the Polynesian island of 
  • Niue. 
  • He said the boy appeared "to be a living memorial to the 
  • inadequacies of the immigration system in New Zealand. He behaved 
  • very much like an uncontrollable animal, and immediately stole a 
  • considerable amount of money and stuffed it into his rectum. 
  • Incidentally, the amount of money which he had pushed into his 
  • rectum was retrieved along with a considerable amount of interest, 
  • which will be forwarded when he returns to you". 
  • An investigation by an ombudsman in the late 1970s found that a 15-
  • year-old boy was given ECT against his will and without the 
  • knowledge of his parents or welfare officers. This might have been 
  • contrary to the law and was a grave injustice, the investigation 
  • found. 
  • In July 1977, Dr Leeks told Wellington's Dominion newspaper that his 
  • unit was full of murderers, rapists and liars. He had not used ECT 
  • in a punitive way, and defended it as a useful treatment when a 
  • patient was dangerous. 
  • In a statement, Prime Minister Helen Clark said that, whatever the 
  • medical practice was at the time, "what occurred to these young 
  • people was unacceptable by any standard, in particular the 
  • inappropriate use of electric shocks and injections". 
  • "The people involved were young - some of them children - and many 
  • from troubled backgrounds, including wards of the state," she 
  • said. "Some were sent to the child's adolescent unit primarily 
  • because there was nowhere else for them to go."


No comments:

Post a Comment